Friday, June 29, 2007

Mini Movie Reviews


Saw Live Free or Die Hard on Tuesday and Transformers last night. HOLY COW!!! Two movies that are about as fun as they come.

Of course in "Die Hard" land, things always borderline on the improbable, but watching the nape shaving escapes is completely delicious! I had a phenomenal time!

Transformers has a lot going for it - Great action, funny, and a babe factor not to be reckoned with! Summer movies just got a whole lot hotter.



UPDATE: I was severely and harshly chastised for my Die Hard mini-review. So here's another take: The movie was a true roller coaster ride in John McClain fashion. It hits hard and fast and doesn't let up until the very end. There are some great surprises, and a couple of setups reminiscent of the "Chompers" in Galaxy Quest - or the ravine in Jurassic Park. Watch and you will see what I mean. Overall - I rate this film kick ass (scratching ass and spitting as I walk off the set)!

I hate it when my friends get screwed.

I am only one small blogger in a big world wide web, but I am going to do what I can to get this message out. What follows is an email from a friend of mine which should rightly piss you off. If it doesn't at least make you mutter a profanity to yourself then I label you a cold, heartless wench or bastard.

Friends,

Sorry for the very spammy nature of this email. I don’t normally like to do this, but I feel the need to warn everyone I know about an experience I’ve had. I wish that I had one of those big popular blogs so that I could really spread the word about this and publically embarrass Expedia.com, but the best thing I can do is tell my friends and family.

A week ago, I had the opportunity to go to Chicago to teach a class. As I normally do, I booked the trip through Expedia.com. I took one of their package deals – hotel, car, airfare. Since I had never been to Chicago before, I simply selected the first hotel that came up on their rankings.

I arrived in Chicago, rented my car, and drove to the hotel, arriving about 1am. The clerk at the front desk informed me that the machine to make keys for the rooms was broken, but that he could let me into the room and I could get a key in the morning. This raised some suspicions, but it was 1am, I was tired, and had to work the next day, so I said fine.

The next morning, the day clerk – who I later learned was the manager – said that the machine was still broken, and that I would be able to get a key that night.

As it happened, some family members happened to be visiting Chicago at the same time, so after work I went into town and hung out with them. Because of this, it was pretty late that night before I returned to my hotel. The clerk (the same one from the night before) said that now, not only could I not get a key, but in fact the entire floor on which I was staying was now locked, and he had no way to give me access to my room. He offered instead to let me sleep in a different room, which would of course give me a bed, but not access to my pajamas or toothbrush or anything of the kind.

Initially, because I was tired and because I was really just shocked that this could happen, I agreed. However, after getting to the second room, I started to think about it and got angry. Not knowing what exactly I could do, I contacted the local police. Fairly quickly, an officer arrived. He said that there was nothing criminal, so there wasn’t really anything he could do, but he did leave a stern message for the manager, hoping that a call from the police might convince him to come down to the hotel and let me in. That was to no avail, but the officer did tell me that they respond to 2-3 complaints about this hotel every week, and that it’s always folks like me who booked the hotel through Expedia, Hotwire, or a similar service. Honestly, he said, he couldn’t understand how those services could list hotels of this quality.

I then called Expedia, figuring that since I was technically their customer, not the hotel’s, that they might be willing to help. After playing the “let me speak to your supervisor” game, I was put on with a gentleman who initially said that he could only refund the cost of the last night (I was supposed to stay three nights, and this was 5am on the second night, but any idiot could tell I wouldn’t be staying the third.) After some more arguing, he agreed to refund the entire cost of the hotel.

The third night went well. My dad was able to use his United connections and get me a good rate at the Hyatt by the airport.

Fast forward a week and half to today. I checked my back account, and discovered that Expedia had not refunded anything, so I called them back. It was, believe it or not, like starting over. The woman I spoke with could clearly see the record of my calls from the week before, but continued to act as though this was all new to Expedia, and insisted that the best they could do would be to refund me the cost of the one night I did not stay in the hotel, but that they could only do that if the hotel confirmed that I did, in fact, check out early. They called the hotel, who said that I did not check out early. However, the hotel apparently said that they would actually have to confirm with the manager, who of course was not there. I then insisted on talking to a supervisor, but was informed that it would be at least an hour and that they would call me back.

The one and only point in this entire experience where Expedia has done what they said they would is when they did, in fact, call back, a little over an hour later. At first, I was talking to the same woman, but fairly quickly insisted on actually talking to the supervisor. After a lot of calm talking and a lot of yelling and a whole lot of being put on hold, I was told that the only thing that Expedia was willing to offer me was a $100 refund and a $100 credit for future travel on their site. Now, I need to point out here that what I was asking for – a complete refund of the cost of the hotel – was only $166. So after more yelling and more being on hold, I was told that Expedia was going to stick to that offer.

It’s also worth pointing out that since I became a contract instructor over a year ago, I have been travelling once or twice a month to San Francisco, and always booked through Expedia. I have already done 8 trips through them this year, and have never once called to complain about anything. When I tried to point out that not only was I up until now a loyal customer, but that I was also a frequent customer, the response I got – and I only wish I was kidding – was that my complaint was not very important to them. I made one final appeal, telling them that if I accepted this offer, then I would book one final trip on Expedia to use the $100 voucher, and I would make sure that the total cost of the trip was as close to $100 as possible, and that Expedia would forever loose me as a customer. It would essentially cost them $66 to keep me around. They repeated that they were unwilling to do this.

So that’s what customers are worth to Expedia. If you have a legitimate complaint about the quality of a hotel that they list – and one backed up by the local police, no less – you will be told that your complaint just isn’t important to them. They will throw you a bone to shut you up, but nothing more. By the way, I have attempted to post a review of this hotel on their site three times over the last week, explaining the exact quality of this place, and they have three times refused to post the review, so if you go to the site and search for the Mt. Prospect Hotel in Mt. Prospect, Illinois, you will see that Expedia gives it two stars, but that there are no customer reviews. Given what the police said, I suspect that there have in fact been many customer reviews of this place, but there are none that Expedia is willing to post.

My opinion about customer service is this. Companies are run by human beings, and thus will make mistakes. That’s not really a problem. But good companies, companies that are worth spending our money with, are those that when customers come to them with problems, they are willing to make it right. Expedia believes that customer complaints are unimportant.

So, my friends, I would strongly urge you to boycott Expedia. They are not the only game in town – as those of you who travel know, there are plenty of other discount travel sites on the web. And they all offer essentially the same options and the same costs. The difference is that one of them thinks that it is okay to list and book customers in hotels with a record of police complaints; one of them thinks that it is okay to block negative reviews of the hotel; and one of them thinks that customer complaints are unimportant, and will take the word of the hotel over the word of a loyal customer. I meant it when I said that I will book exactly one more trip through them (I’m going to San Francisco again in a week, and will use it for my hotel), but then they have lost my business forever. I hope for your own sakes that they do not receive yours, either. Customers do not matter to them.

Name withheld

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

In "Ain't That A Bitch" news...

From the Associated Press, June 26, 2007 10:22 a.m. PT

SEATTLE -- A Washington fisherman who cut off two fingertips to save himself from a sinking boat is recovering after a successful reattachment surgery, a spokesman for his employer said Tuesday.

Surgeons at Harborview Medical Center in Seattle told William Messenger, 51, that circulation has returned to the severed tips and they will not have to re-amputate, Washington State Labor Council spokesman David Groves said. A groggy Messenger spoke with the Labor Council by phone early Tuesday morning.

Messenger was fishing with his future son-in-law, Jarrod Todd, on the Wynoochee River in Southwest Washington on Sunday when their 16-foot drift boat slammed against a log, pinning Messenger's left index and middle fingers. The pressure of the water held the boat in place.

The boat was turned upstream at a 45-degree angle and began to fill with water, Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott said. Todd escaped and went to a nearby home in Aberdeen for help. In the meantime, Scott said, Messenger straddled the quickly filling boat and began to worry it would sink before Todd returned.

He decided he could not wait any longer and cut off the two pinned fingertips with a pocket knife, Scott said. Minutes later Todd arrived with help, a pry bar and tools.

"Hindsight is 20-20. If he'd have known help was not that far away, he might have held off taking the steps that he did," Scott said.

One tough hombre! But only "minutes later".... That sucks.

For another hour I turned my guy card in...

I just finished watching "Science of Love" on NBC. The premise? A bachelor goes on dates with two women - one he picks himself from 50 potential matches compiled from a database of over 2 million via an Internet dating service; and the other scientifically chosen for him by a team of scientists after submitting him to a full battery of psychological and physiological tests, analyzing the results and choosing from a database of over 5 million women. The question: Can science make a better match for someone than they can for themselves?

Now this is a an interesting concept, but it was only partially executed correctly. I dug that the scientific tests were very comprehensive, including handwriting analysis, polygraph tests, biometric feedback, personality tests, and even iris analysis. I liked the girl they chose, and the girl the bachelor chose for himself was also a great find. But the flaw was in the execution of the dates: With the girl he chose, the bachelor setup and planned the whole date, while the other one was completely planned by science (along with a bunch of semi-necessary facts thrown in). Based on that, he had to make a decision (I won't give away the ending). But while on the "scientific" date, everything was psychologically and physiologically planned to illicit certain responses, so how much of a fair measure is it? I say he should have gone on TWO dates with each woman, one "engineered" and one of his planning. Then his decision would have more equal weight. I believe this would have given the show a much more scientific result, because in the end it still would come down to either his instincts or science.

And also, I would really like a follow up... did the decision "stick?"

I will now re-attach my balls and go to bed.

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Everything's Deadlier in Texas...

From the Associated Press - June 20th, 2007

AUSTIN, Texas - A crowd attacked and killed a passenger in a vehicle that had struck and injured a child, police said Wednesday.

Police believe 2,000 to 3,000 people were in the area for a Juneteenth celebration when the attack occurred Tuesday night. The man who was killed had been trying to stop the group from attacking the vehicle's driver when the crowd turned on him, authorities said.

The Austin Police Department identified the victim as David Rivas Morales, 40. The child was taken to a hospital with non-life threatening injuries.

Police spokeswoman Toni Chovonetz said she had no further information, including how many people were involved.

The driver, who was able to get away, is cooperating with investigators, police said.

Juneteenth marks the day Gen. Gordon Granger arrived in Galveston in 1865 to share news of the Emancipation Proclamation, which freed slaves two years earlier on Jan. 1, 1863.

Notice the kid was treated for non-life threatening injuries. Imagine what would've happened had the child died!

When I was a kid, one day I was out with my Mom as she was shopping. I was in the shopping cart, and I was hounding her about one thing or another when she get got fed up and without looking backhanded me, resulting in a bloody nose. Now I know she didn't mean it, and before the calls to CPS begin, it was over 30 years ago. I will now thank God every day that we weren't in Texas at the time.

Man, some people just don't think...

So - anyone who knows me knows I have one vice, Diet Toxic Sludge (a.k.a. Diet Coke). I don't drink coffee, and after breakfast I usually get one to get my day started. So, right now McD's has a special going on - Extra Large soda for .69. Awesome! 44 oz. of heaven for less than a buck.

So this morning I hit the drive thru and place my order. I pull up to the window and the brainiac hands me a standard large cup. I tell her I ordered an extra large, and she says "Yeah, but we are out of extra large cups." Now this wouldn't really be an issue, except if I hadn't questioned it, she would've given me the soda without a word. Why in the name of all that is holy would she not simply say when I placed my order "I am sorry, but we are out of extra large cups. I will give you a large for the same price...." Common courtesy. What a concept!

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Pop Culture vs. Those With Their Heads Up Their...

Here is another classic case of those who just "don't get it" being stupid:

From the Sacramento Bee dated June 18th -

(Keith) Wagner is a Sacramento attorney who has a personalized license plate on his 2004 Toyota that reads "GO 2 11." A couple of weeks ago, he got a letter from the DMV informing him the department had received a complaint about his plate, and they wanted him to return it.

Although the letter didn't say what was offensive, a DMV minion told Wagner it had been interpreted to mean "Go to hell" and was therefore odious to at least part of the California driving public. As if that were possible.

Anyway, Wagner says the plate means "Go to 11," which he says is homage to a line from the rock mockumentary "This is Spinal Tap," wherein a somewhat addled guitarist points proudly to the fact that the knobs on his amp "go to 11" instead of the usual 10. So where does the Senate fit in all this?

In requesting a hearing to defend his plate, Wagner points out that in a recent debate on the Senate floor -- as reported by The Buzz last week -- the word "hell" was ruled not to be a profanity under Senate rules.

At press time, Wagner was still waiting for the DMV to tell him where to go.

Since when can I be punished for someone else's stupidity? Why wasn't someone at the DMV able to simply inquire as to the meaning (if they didn't kn0w), then notify the complainant to go get a life? Oh wait... that would've been logical. Sorry, I forgot we are talking about mindless drones.

Thursday, June 14, 2007

This is very funny...

If you are a techno-geek. OK, you don't have to be a techo-geek, but you have to at least understand computers. I don't think this judge does.

In a decision reported late Friday by CNET News.com, a federal judge in Los Angeles found (PDF) that a computer server's RAM, or random-access memory, is a tangible document that can be stored and must be turned over in a lawsuit.

Kudos to the one who figures out how to accomplish this in an efficient manner.

I believe in the American Dream...

but I resolutely don't believe in the newest immigration reform bill. Here's my problem in a nutshell: I have no problem with people coming to this country for their shot at the dream, but I really hate the people who do it illegally. The arguments regarding their contribution to farmworker labor doesn't float. I understand the plight of the farmer, but paying someone less than minimum wage is tantamount to slave labor and I don't go in for that either.

The biggest problem with the reform bill are the provisos for the current 12 million (plus or minus) illegal aliens currently here. They pay $5000 in penalties and we suddenly welcome them with open arms? No thank you. Here is a summary of what the bill entails regarding current illegal aliens:
  • They could come forward immediately and receive probationary legal status.
  • Bill creates a four-year, renewable "Z" visa for those present within the U.S. unlawfully before Jan. 1, 2007.
  • Undocumented immigrants may adjust status to lawful permanent residence once they pay $5,000 in fees and fines and their head of household returns to their home country.
  • People under age 30 who were brought to the U.S. as minors could receive their green cards after three years, rather than eight.
  • Undocumented farmworkers who can demonstrate they have worked 150 hours or three years in agriculture can apply for green cards.
  • No green cards for "Z" visa holders can be processed until "triggers" for border security and workplace enforcement have been met, estimated to take 18 months. Processing of green cards for holders of "Z" visas would begin after clearing an existing backlog, which is expected to take eight years.
I heard something on the local newstalk radio about this I found very compelling - First, how do you enforce this? Over 12 million people are currently here illegally and are apparently getting away with it, so how would this resolve that issue? Does it make sense that those who are currently here and haven't been caught will suddenly decide to turn themselves in and pay $5000? Yeah... that's gonna' happen.

We are a very forgiving and compassionate country. Taking a hard stance on those who wish to abuse our generosity is not wrong. I agree with the portions of the bill which provide for increased funds for border patrol and security, but let's change the focus of the rest of the bill. Instead of "amnesty" provisos, every time an undocumented alien is pulled over for a traffic violation, tries to get medical aid - basically anytime we are in a position to recognize and arrest them we do and we send them back home. A hardline stance will both make it very unpopular for those who think sneaking in will be a cakewalk and save taxpayer funds in insurance and other places where we are burdened for having to cover the costs of undocumented aliens.

To those who say that though they are here illegally they aren't hurting anyone and are actually contributing, I say if that is the case then do so legally. Otherwise you are hurting those of us who only break the law legally.

Friday, June 08, 2007

Thank everything you believe in...

Ms. Hilton is back in jail! I bear her no ill will, but I am among the many - very many - who believe the over-privileged should not be able to simply believe the laws don't apply to them. The fact she had such disregard for the law as to get stopped not once, but TWICE on a suspended license following a DUI is enough of a message to me she should be behind bars. Apparently, she wasn't even going to take this seriously either. Medical condition? Seriously?

She would have had better luck here if she had pled for her safety (harassment by other prisoners or staff). At least that might have had some credibility as an argument.

Some say the judge "overreacted" and the punishment was too harsh. What possible punishment would have been doled out had she been simply under house arrest? Punishment is defined as a "penalty for wrongdoing", and "restricting" someone to a $3.1 million dollar home, someone with the means to be completely waited on and catered to is not punishment. The judge originally remanded her for only 23 days (including reduced time for good behavior), now she gets to serve 45. Good.

Paris Hilton is not being singled out as an example. She screwed up, and is paying for it. Let's all wish her well, then do a happy dance! Someone needs to invent a new drink - the Hilton Slammer!

Thanks to Drew for this...

Every office should implement this policy.

Thursday, June 07, 2007

Now this is laughable...


Paris Hilton has ALREADY been released from prison... after only 5 days! She has been fitted with an ankle bracelet (I am sure Paris will have it diamond encrusted) and sent home to serve the rest of her sentence due to "medical reasons".

Medical reasons... must be vapidusaberratio (go ahead and do the research on this... I dare ya!)

Yesterday i thought I was going to die. For the first time in literally about 10 years I suffered an all day allergy attack. I took an Alavert before I left the house, added a Claritin 4 hours later when that didn't work, and 3 hours later took a Benedryl (which finally provided some relief).

Friday night is a Poker night... looking forward to that. I have been "honing" my skills on the PS2 that has semi-permanently moved to my house (since the owner has purchased both a PS3 and an XBOX360). I entered the World Series of Poker Main Event (twice) and placed 9th the first time and 2nd the next! I am completely ready to compete -- against a machine that doesn't know my tell and opponents I don't have to read. On the plus side, I have a PS2 bankroll of over $6M... yeah!

From the canine world, my dog has pretty much acclimated to life in my house. She no longer completely bolts when I open a Diet Coke (bottle or can), is much, MUCH better in dealing with men (when I first got her she was incredibly skiddish around men), and believes that if I am awake, then it must obviously be playtime - period.

Talk to ya' soon.